The Hobbit or Lord of the Rings? — Tolkien Artists Reflect
Thursday, May 27, 2010
posted by Al Harron
The two Middle-earth masterpieces Tolkien lived to see publications of are somewhat remarkable in their differences. The Hobbit is a tale with as much humour, song and merriment as it has dark terror, strenuous toil and rousing adventure: The Lord of the Rings almost seems a different animal in many ways. Many a reader might prefer one over the other: The Hobbit’s light and breezy prose winning some over, the grand epic narrative of The Lord of the Rings convincing others. Then when you throw The Silmarillion and The History of Middle-earth into the fray…
Even the professionals find themselves respecting both, but being partial to one. Irene Gallo has written a fascinating article, where she has gathered renowned Tolkien artists and posed such questions: which tome is their favourite, which do they prefer to illustrate, which was harder or easier to adapt into a visual medium, and so on. Among the illustrators queried are Ted Nasmith, Justin Gerard, John Howe, Sam Bosma, Mattias Adolfsson, Stephen Hickman, and familiar Howard illustrator extraordinaire Michael W. M. Kaluta.












